The performance of István Kovács in the clash between FC Barcelona and Atlético de Madrid has raised a very specific question: will UEFA take action after what happened at Montjuïc?
The biggest controversy came in the 53rd minute. Marc Pubill handled the ball inside the box after a restart from Juan Musso, but no penalty was given. Even more striking, VAR did not intervene to review the incident.
After the match, Hansi Flick openly showed his frustration, pointing directly at that decision and the use of VAR.
A match full of controversy
The tension escalated further with another key moment. Kovács initially showed a yellow card to Pau Cubarsí, but after a VAR review, the decision was upgraded to a straight red card.
That call changed the entire course of the game before Atlético’s first goal. From that point on, the match became heavily influenced by refereeing decisions, and the controversy only grew.
The Pubill handball: the key incident
The most debated action remains the handball. The issue is not just the missed penalty, but the type of mistake attributed to the referee.
According to the IFAB Laws of the Game, a handball offence is committed when a player makes their body unnaturally bigger. In this case, the main debate revolves around whether the ball was already in play after the restart.
The majority interpretation suggests that it was, which is why many experts believe the action should have resulted in a penalty.
Several refereeing analysts in Spain have been highly critical, describing the decision as a “serious technical error” rather than a subjective interpretation.
Does this mean an immediate UEFA punishment?
This is where an important nuance appears. UEFA do not publicly announce punishments such as a “cooling-off period” for referees.
There is no official confirmation of sanctions after a specific match. Instead, consequences usually appear indirectly through future appointments.
As the competition progresses toward semi-finals and finals, only the most trusted referees are selected. That is where the real impact will be seen.
A key moment for Kovács
Kovács was chosen for this match because of his high standing within European refereeing. He is still considered one of the top officials and has even been involved in recent FIFA programmes linked to the 2026 World Cup.
However, that status also comes with pressure. At this level, every major mistake carries significant weight, especially in decisive stages of the competition.
What is most likely to happen now
With the information available, the most accurate conclusion is this: there is no confirmed punishment, but there is a real risk to his future appointments.
The true indicator will be his next assignments. If Kovács is absent from Champions League semi-finals or other major fixtures, it will likely be interpreted as a consequence of what happened in Barcelona.
If he continues to be appointed for top-level matches, it will suggest UEFA have not considered the errors severe enough to sideline him.
For now, the situation remains open.
There is no official sanction, but his next appointment will provide the real answer.
Discover more from Barça Buzz
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
